全球主机交流论坛

标题: 要托管服务器啦，大伙帮忙测一下速度。 [打印本页]

作者: zdw 时间: 2010-5-25 20:01
标题: 要托管服务器啦，大伙帮忙测一下速度。
受不了国外的速度了，回国托管服务器，大伙帮忙测一下ping
河南周口网通：222.136.188.1
河北保定网通：221.194.37.11

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 221.194.37.11

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=116
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=116
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=116
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 36ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 222.136.188.1

Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=244
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=244
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=244
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 37ms

作者: cpuer 时间: 2010-5-25 20:04
Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 75ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Wu>ping 221.194.37.11

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=112

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 261ms, Maximum = 269ms, Average = 265ms

第一个是网通的？我电信访问很快。

作者: liss 时间: 2010-5-25 20:05
Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 221.194.37.11

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=124
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=124
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=124
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 222.136.188.1

Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=245
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=245
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=245
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 47ms

作者: lemss 时间: 2010-5-25 20:06
我是网通，速度很快，50ms左右

作者: zdw 时间: 2010-5-25 20:06
谢谢大家，都是网通的，河南周口那个15M独享一年限27OO元。
河北保定那些个10M独享一年3200元。

作者: 骑猪奔月 时间: 2010-5-25 20:36
第一个BGP了吧？

作者: baqfhwqqq 时间: 2010-5-25 20:39
哎。。国内的话，还不如搞双线了呢。。

Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=243

作者: baqfhwqqq 时间: 2010-5-25 20:39
Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=255ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=296ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=115

作者: baqfhwqqq 时间: 2010-5-25 20:39
我电信的，，看看丢包率。。还不如用国外的爽。。就算抽风，也没这么严重。。

作者: winsock 时间: 2010-5-25 20:41
苏州电信adsl 2m

PING 222.136.188.1 (222.136.188.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=198 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=200 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=191 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=243 time=193 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=243 time=189 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=243 time=185 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=243 time=186 ms
64 bytes from 222.136.188.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=243 time=184 ms

PING 221.194.37.11 (221.194.37.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=334 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=115 time=335 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=115 time=331 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=115 time=334 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=115 time=335 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=6 ttl=115 time=328 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=7 ttl=115 time=327 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=8 ttl=115 time=335 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=9 ttl=115 time=333 ms
64 bytes from 221.194.37.11: icmp_seq=10 ttl=115 time=328 ms

作者: 网络寄生虫 时间: 2010-5-25 20:42
标题: 回复 9# 的帖子
应该是你的问题吧

我这也电信就没事

作者: yanqing001 时间: 2010-5-25 20:46
Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=367ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=364ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=364ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=370ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=368ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=364ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=370ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=364ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=243
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=364ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 21, Lost = 5 (19% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 364ms, Maximum = 370ms, Average = 365ms

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115
Request timed out.
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=115

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 24, Received = 22, Lost = 2 (8% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 141ms, Maximum = 143ms, Average = 142ms

作者: Showfom 时间: 2010-5-25 20:46
C:\Users\dell>ping 222.136.188.1

正在 Ping 222.136.188.1 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 222.136.188.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间=122ms TTL=244
来自 222.136.188.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间=123ms TTL=244
来自 222.136.188.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间=124ms TTL=244
来自 222.136.188.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间=156ms TTL=244

222.136.188.1 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 122ms，最长 = 156ms，平均 = 131ms

C:\Users\dell>ping 221.194.37.11

正在 Ping 221.194.37.11 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 221.194.37.11 的回复: 字节=32 时间=52ms TTL=119
来自 221.194.37.11 的回复: 字节=32 时间=39ms TTL=119
来自 221.194.37.11 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=119
来自 221.194.37.11 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=119

221.194.37.11 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 38ms，最长 = 52ms，平均 = 41ms

我就在河北，所以ping河北的超快

作者: leven 时间: 2010-5-25 20:52
国内双线机房一般带宽较少，限制较多，价格较贵，很不划算

作者: 网络寄生虫 时间: 2010-5-25 20:53
标题: 回复 14# 的帖子
北京BPG 才给2M

作者: 网络寄生虫 时间: 2010-5-25 20:53
但是全国访问速度超快

作者: leven 时间: 2010-5-25 20:54
访问快也白搭，一个两个快，等你带宽跑满了就痛苦了

作者: ATOM 时间: 2010-5-25 20:59
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 221.194.37.11

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=112
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=112

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 40ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 222.136.188.1

Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=240
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 68ms, Maximum = 103ms, Average = 91ms

作者: 网络寄生虫 时间: 2010-5-25 21:00

有钱可以多申请带宽么

作者: leven 时间: 2010-5-25 21:04
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 222.136.188.1

Pinging 222.136.188.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=249
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=249
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=249
Reply from 222.136.188.1: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=249

Ping statistics for 222.136.188.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 221.194.37.11

Pinging 221.194.37.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=118
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=118
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=118
Reply from 221.194.37.11: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 221.194.37.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 24ms

速度还是蛮不错滴

作者: cxm 时间: 2010-5-25 21:15
周口网通曾经断电过。。59互联办事死板。。。

作者: zdw 时间: 2010-5-25 21:17
标题: 回复 21# 的帖子
哥们你真神，怎么一猜就知道是59互联？
在价格和速率之间考虑，我在国内找不到更便宜的了。

作者: zdw 时间: 2010-5-25 22:00
基本上决定了，还是用保定网通，虽然贵一点，但是离北京近些。

作者: cxm 时间: 2010-5-25 22:05
标题: 回复 22# 的帖子
有三门峡网通 10M独享是2200

作者: cxm 时间: 2010-5-25 22:06
因为我是河南人，所以河南的机房比较了解一些。。。周口那里是59的老家。。

作者: cxm 时间: 2010-5-25 23:02
标题: 回复 26# 的帖子
你随意搜索一下应该很多啊。。。三门峡网通就值这个钱

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://fd.vvwvv.eu.org/)

Powered by Discuz! X3.4