全球主机交流论坛

标题: wske的vps测试放出 [打印本页]

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 00:05
标题: wske的vps测试放出
我这里测试情况还不错。不过。。。说实话价格似乎没什么优势

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 正在执行请等待 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. [泉州电信] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=205毫秒 TTL=44
2. [天津网通] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=235毫秒 TTL=46
3. [宁波电信] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=220毫秒 TTL=43
4. [深圳长宽] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=239毫秒 TTL=46
5. [福州电信] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=189毫秒 TTL=46
6. [上海移动] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=291毫秒 TTL=45
7. [襄樊电信] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=224毫秒 TTL=46
8. [河南网通2] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=328毫秒 TTL=46
9. [上海电信2] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=159毫秒 TTL=46
10. [河南网通] 字节=32 状态=Success 时间=276毫秒 TTL=47
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 执行完毕 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
UID8196 帖子33 精华0 积分55 阅读权限20 在线时间0 小时注册时间2010-8-8 最后登录2010-8-10 查看详细资料

# #  # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #
# #  ## #  # #  #          # #  #    ## #  # #  # #
# #  # #  #  # ##          ##### ##### # #  #  #    ######
# #  #  # #  # ##          # #  #    #  # #  #    # #
# #  # ##  # #  #          # #  #    # ##  # #  # #
#### # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #

Version 5.1.2                   Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                    Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation  1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Thu Jul 1 20:25:56 EDT 2010
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6685.6 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6685.6 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6685.6 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6685.6 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
22:55:08 up 21 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 10 2010 22:55:08 - 23:23:27
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    12345657.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   2445.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            2000.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       547004.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       148737.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1518644.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            1025773.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                148648.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            5145.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                4883.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1157.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      1161540.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 12345657.3 1057.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    2445.3 444.6
Execl Throughput                               43.0    2000.1 465.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    547004.5 1381.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    148737.6 898.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1518644.5 2618.4
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 1025773.0 824.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    148648.4 371.6
Process Creation                               126.0    5145.0 408.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    4883.7 1151.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1157.1 1928.6
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 1161540.5 774.4
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        855.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 10 2010 23:23:27 - 23:51:37
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    38640679.6 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   9227.9 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            5066.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       354624.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          91139.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1079806.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            3491160.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                484930.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            7636.6 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                9868.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1509.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      4075645.6 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 38640679.6 3311.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    9227.9 1677.8
Execl Throughput                               43.0    5066.6 1178.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    354624.9 895.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    91139.3 550.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1079806.5 1861.7
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 3491160.4 2806.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    484930.1 1212.3
Process Creation                               126.0    7636.6 606.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    9868.5 2327.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1509.0 2515.0
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 4075645.6 2717.1
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                     1553.2

======= Script description and score comparison: =======

http://www.ctohome.com/FuWuQi/c5/172.html

[ 本帖最后由 sense520 于 2010-8-11 07:08 编辑 ]

作者: hx 时间: 2010-8-11 00:09
价格还不错吧，西海岸唯一的cogentco呢。

作者: aijusq 时间: 2010-8-11 00:11
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 00:12
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 00:15

原帖由 hx 于 2010-8-11 00:09 发表
价格还不错吧，西海岸唯一的cogentco呢。

我的意思是指跟其他有一定口碑和运营时间的公司对比而言。。

作者: hx 时间: 2010-8-11 00:16

原帖由 sense520 于 2010-8-11 00:15 发表

我的意思是指跟其他有一定口碑和运营时间的公司对比而言。。

哦，怕跑路啊，这个担心倒是必要的。

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 00:17
请wske不要生气，我只是讲实话。。如果价格相差不大，请给我个选择个人新开张服务的理由？

作者: hx 时间: 2010-8-11 00:18
标题: 回复 7# 的帖子
目前我看来也就是线路好点，其他just so so啦。

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 00:18
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 00:20
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 00:33
我都不好意思回帖了。毕竟参与了测试，我可不想被认为是故意砸场的。。。
只是因为最近在纠结photonvps，ecvps,VPSyou

1. 这台独服上只卖14个VPS 大家都这样说。。
2. 支持支付宝，人民币付款 photonvps ecvps VPSyou也支持
3. 中文客服同上
4. 价钱适中见仁见智吧。。。

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 00:41
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: hx 时间: 2010-8-11 00:46
标题: 回复 11# 的帖子
xen卖多少个可以算出来的，楼主新来的？

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 00:51
没注意看到是xen的。。。哈哈
不过确实是新来的。。以前一直用国内的，都是HY-V

作者: 大飞机 时间: 2010-8-11 01:00
那里买？

作者: vnconfig 时间: 2010-8-11 02:41
xen卖多少个可以算出来的，所以通常高端的xen比低端的稳定，配置翻一倍不稳定性也跟着降一半。
网络确实稳，不过现在国内是晚上，白天再测一测吧。

作者: ezpeer 时间: 2010-8-11 02:52
# #  # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #
# #  ## #  # #  #          # #  #    ## #  # #  # #
# #  # #  #  # ##          ##### ##### # #  #  #    ######
# #  #  # #  # ##          # #  #    #  # #  #    # #
# #  # ##  # #  #          # #  #    # ##  # #  # #
#### # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #

Version 5.1.2                   Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                    Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation  1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Thu Jul 1 20:25:56 EDT 2010
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6765.2 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6765.2 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6765.2 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (6765.2 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
01:16:50 up  2:09,  1 user,  load average: 0.27, 0.08, 0.02; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 11 2010 01:16:50 - 01:44:56
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    12439299.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   2451.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            2036.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       562887.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       152862.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1538138.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            1025871.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                148167.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            5250.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                4979.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1217.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      1165118.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 12439299.9 1065.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    2451.5 445.7
Execl Throughput                               43.0    2036.9 473.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    562887.4 1421.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    152862.0 923.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1538138.1 2652.0
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 1025871.1 824.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    148167.6 370.4
Process Creation                               126.0    5250.9 416.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    4979.1 1174.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1217.1 2028.5
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 1165118.6 776.7
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        868.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 11 2010 01:44:56 - 02:13:13
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    42998361.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   9431.4 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            5407.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       313388.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          84620.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1133704.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            3416473.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                460219.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            7094.3 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                9257.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1377.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      3867529.9 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 42998361.4 3684.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    9431.4 1714.8
Execl Throughput                               43.0    5407.5 1257.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    313388.4 791.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    84620.8 511.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1133704.6 1954.7
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 3416473.5 2746.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    460219.2 1150.5
Process Creation                               126.0    7094.3 563.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    9257.1 2183.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1377.9 2296.6
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 3867529.9 2578.4
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                     1513.6

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 07:10
从ecvps下载过去的速度还是相当的诱人~看来两家的带宽都不错啊

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 07:12
4分钟下完2.7G的数据。。。要是国内也有这么快。。。

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 07:57
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: cpuer 时间: 2010-8-11 08:52
在vps上做个路由跟踪回国内电信看看，希望验证下是否真正的cogentco单线

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-8-11 09:15
汗，他们网站都打不开。。

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 09:18
已经挂了。。。汗

作者: dream26 时间: 2010-8-11 09:20

原帖由 sense520 于 2010-8-11 07:10 发表
从ecvps下载过去的速度还是相当的诱人~看来两家的带宽都不错啊

嗯..我們用的是 1000M

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 09:24
dream26...QQ那个专员是你吗？申请的优惠咋样了。。

作者: wske 时间: 2010-8-11 09:27
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 09:31
现在恢复了，飞快~

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-8-11 10:28
一早上挂2次了

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-11 10:37
呵呵，好像是又挂了。。

作者: 小菜鸟 时间: 2010-8-11 10:42
好像又挂了？受攻击了吧？

杯具呀。

作者: dream26 时间: 2010-8-11 10:47

原帖由 sense520 于 2010-8-11 09:24 发表
dream26...QQ那个专员是你吗？申请的优惠咋样了。。

QQ 我吧

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://fd.vvwvv.eu.org/)